Choosing Marathi Essay Topics

Choosing Marathi Essay Topics Ok, I Think I Understand Marathi Essay Topics, Now Tell Me About Marathi Essay Topics! Finding the most suitable arguments can help you prove your point and win. You will receive a total of 30 minutes to complete your paper. Do not be hesitant to ask questions if there are a number of unclear points. It can confuse him and become another headache to cope with. Get prepared to answer all these aspects if in the event you get this subject in the XAT Essay. The Essay Topics list is provided for English along with Hindi section. Well, the solution isn't too obvious here. To compose a terrific argumentative essay the students first must investigate several sides of the argument, which enables them to make an educated stance. Schools should not have anything to do with ads. Textbooks are obsolete and ought to be replaced by iPads. And you should prepare well all of the Important Essay Topics for Competitive Exams. Plenty of students put on a uni form. Thus, the essay for our staff it is simpler than ever. Writing a research paper even though may appear challenging is a considerable portion of routine student life. Ultimately, if you are supposed to write and essay but have very little knowledge or interest in the topic, don't forget that there are lots of custom essay writers which will gladly do the task for you. Make the usage of the suggested research paper topic ideas and you'll be prosperous. Inside my experience, descriptive essays are only difficult in regards to deciding just what things to write about. Like, within this essay we've given a concise introduction about Now ongoing with it here will come the most important body of the essay, inside this most important section you need to be descriptive and compose all your points, arguments, views in a suitable manner. You may find that a lot of the topics can be adapted to suit almost any sort of writing assignment. They're a chance to do some creative writing, even in the event the essay topic you decide on looks pretty boring at first. The Benefits of Marathi Essay Topics The SSC MTS Descriptive Paper will be run soon. Trade Facilitation is a significant component of AAGC Framework. But What About Marathi Essay Topics? Therefore, here are a few basic tips that will help you in writing of good descriptive essay. There are a lot of intriguing topics that could be become a persuasive essay if you take the opportu nity to think about doing it. It would be less difficult to learn more about the theme and write about doing it. 3 page essay on the large depression. You should understand completely that you're not writing a descriptive essay. You should utilize APA reference tools to aid in writing your essay the right way or employ an expert essay writer that could write the essay working with the APA reference tools. In addition, it provides the explanations for why the writer chose the topic. Luckily, you have our top-class group of writers who can assist students and teach them how to pick the most suitable essay direction. If you're confused with a selection of interesting topics to research online, it's far better to choose what interests you the most. Also, do not forget that you'll have to offer some factual evidence for your opinion (after all, any academic paper ought to be supported by academically recognized sources), so don't go for subjects which are purely opinionated and don't have any possibility of justification. You have to write a minumum of one research paper in a semester for a lot of the subjects. There's well-known that you won't have the ability to write a great insightful research paper if you're not interested in the subject overall and in the subject particularly. You will need to reveal the readers that you master of the subject and not a confused newbie who doesn't understand what he or she's speaking about. If you're in search of the topic that would be well worth exploring, focus on the little prompts presented for you in this informative article. It's important to understand that essay topics are just basic ideas that leave you pondering a notion that might be a huge deal to somebody else. When you are requested to opt for a great topic for your argument, start with something you're acquainted with. In this column, we're likely to be sharing some of the most important and important tips that can help you realize the best outcomes. Sure, today it appears that getting your hands on any sort of information is straightforward. In high school, you're supposed to choose the sort of topic you are going to be in a position to dig into that is, it's necessary for you to make sure to can discover enough info on the topic. It is vital to protect against the kids from the dust in the home. We've provided very distinctive and general topics essay which are usually assigned to students in the school. Please choose a method of reading classic books are located at cram. In some schools and colleges, senior students take the duty of teaching as a way to clearly show their appreciation for those teachers.

The Theoretical Perspectives Of Sociology - 911 Words

Symbolic interactionism is the first of the three theoretical perspectives in Sociology. This avenue of examining sociological factors looks at more personal interactions than the other two perspectives. Sociologist observe patterns and behaviors of these smaller interactions to define, or redefine, the use and evolution of symbols in society. Some sociologist see this approach as being too focused on one person’s view and take on society rather than trying to understand society as a functioning whole (Turner, Symbolic Interaction Theory†). One example of symbolic interactionism put forth by Erving Goffman (1974) uses Roger, an engineer, as an example. Even though he and his parents believe that Roger is an amazing engineer, their perspective would not take into account that Roger’s boss found his skills to be insufficient and fired him. Without combining these two perspectives, that of Roger and his parents and of his boss, there is not a complete understanding of Roger and his skills, or lack there of. The following two perspectives in Sociology examine society at a larger scale. The second theoretical perspective in Sociology is functional analysis. Functional analysis is used to identify and define relationships between different aspects of society. These relationships are determined to be either functional, which is beneficial to society, or dysfunctional, which is not beneficial. The two previous labels are then broken down further and actions can be deemedShow MoreRelatedSociology And The Theoretical Perspectives Of Sociology1710 Words   |  7 PagesSociology is seen every day in our lives as humans, it is the scientific study of human behavior and society. The idea of sociology has not been around forever. The term sociology comes from a man named Auguste Comte who takes credit for this study. Not only did Comte come up with this idea but there were several things that influenced the study of Sociology and how we view it today. Th ese influences are called the origins of sociology and they include; new idea or discipline, Industrial RevolutionRead MoreTheoretical Perspectives On Sociology And Sociological Perspectives1357 Words   |  6 PagesTheoretical Perspectives in Sociology In the world of sociology there are many different ways that humans interact with the world. Although we are all human beings, we do not always see the world the same way that others do. Even though not many are aware of the different ways they can see the world, there are three sociological perspectives. Using structural functionalism, the conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism one will be able to decide which view best represents the way they see thisRead MoreExample Of The Three Theoretical Perspectives Of Sociology1044 Words   |  5 Pages Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology Nanesha Greathouse HCC Abstract This paper describes the three major theoretical perspectives in Sociology: symbolic interactionism, functionalism and conflict theory. Sociologists developed these theoretical perspectives to help explain the way individuals conduct themselves and to help us to gain a better understanding of the world around us. Throughout this paper, the reader will learn about each perspective and its origin as well as additionalRead MoreTheoretical Perspectives Essay: . Sociology Is The Scientific990 Words   |  4 PagesTheoretical Perspectives Essay: Sociology is the scientific study of how humans and groups behave socially and how they, as a whole, change over time. Through the examination of the scientific side of sociology, the understanding of the social world can be shown more clearly. Within the study of sociology, there are two main branches: micro and macro. Micro sociology is looking at the individual and social interaction. Macro sociology focuses beyond social interaction and seeks to examine systemsRead MoreTheoretical Frameworks Of Sociology And Sociological Perspective Essay918 Words   |  4 Pages What does Sociology have to do with me? Why do people think or act differently than you? Why are some people rich while others are poor? Why do some commit crimes, break laws and others do not? These are all some of the questions students need an answer to, which led them to enrol to this course. â€Å"Sociology is the scientific study of individuals in groups, organizations, cultures and societies; and of the inte rrelationships of individuals, group, organizations, cultures and societies.† (KennedyRead MoreMain Theoretical Perspectives Within Sociology1330 Words   |  6 Pagesneighborhood. Theories try to explain why groups of people do certain things, and why a society changes and how it works. There are three main theoretical perspectives within sociology. These perspectives are functionalism, symbolic interactionism and, conflict theory. To understand phenomena as to the ways groups are formed it is important to follow theoretical perspectives. A theory is a general statement about how some parts of the world fit together and how they work. It is an explanation of how factsRead MoreTheoretical Perspectives in Sociology are Functionalist Perspective, Conflict Perspective, and Symbolic Interactionist Perspective585 Words   |  2 PagesThe three primary theoretical perspectives in sociology are Functionalist Perspective, Conflict Perspective, and Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Functionalist perspective was introduced around the 1940s, by three men: Herbert Spencer, Emile Durkheim, Talcott Parsons, and Robert Merton. According to their perspective, society has intertwined parts that work together to create social balance. In other words, sociologists focus on the connecting various parts of society and analyze how a group/personRead MoreEssay about The Three Major Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology1952 Words   |  8 Pagessociety at different levels and from different perspectives. Sociologists study everything from the micro level of analysis of small social patterns to the â€Å"big picture† which is the macro level of analysis of large social patterns. Sociologists employ three major theoretical perspectives in sociology today. They are the structural-functionalist perspective, the conflict perspective, and the symbolic interactionism. The structural-functionalist perspective is done at a macro level and its focus is onRead MoreOutline and Assess the Five Main Theoretical Perspectives of Sociology2024 Words   |  9 PagesOutline and assess the five main theoretical perspectives of sociology Marxism Marxism is the political philosophy and practice resulting from the work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Any political practice or theory that is based on an interpretation of the works of Marx and Engels may be called Marxism. Under capitalism, the proletariat, the working class own only their capacity to work meaning they have the ability only to sell their own labour. According to Marx a class is definedRead MoreMax Weber And His Contributions1566 Words   |  7 Pageswas considered as one of the three founders of sociology, because he had acquired many ideas that profoundly influenced social theory and social research. For sociology as a whole, Weber’s study of sociology is theoretical-historical, because he had the idea of rationalization based on his observations from the Protestant Work Ethic and other societies to analyze modern societies. This led to the development of one of the main theoretical perspectives, known as interactionism; Weber had supported

My Life Of A Child - 1567 Words

A child imitates its parents while it grows up, thus making them copy or imprint their actions, becoming child’s point of reference as it matures. I being no exception did the same. I looked up to my parents especially my mother, a high school teacher for Chemistry having a strong background in biology as my point of reference. She became my educational pillar and the ember of interest for science kindled right from my childhood days. This ember of interest turned into flames when I entered my high school. The role of my alma mater S.A. Jain Sr. Model school is unforgettable in moulding me a unique personality. My schooling provided me with the much needed information for a scientific approach in life. It taught me that just having†¦show more content†¦The educational motto of the college â€Å"Thorough knowledge of fundamental principles and expertise in core topics† helped me set a firm foot in the door. Apart from strong foundation in theoretical knowledge, I also participated in academic research project entitled â€Å"Process Engineering of Xylanolytic Enzymes from Different Bacterial Isolates for Commercial Application†. We, a team of two students isolated potent cellulase free xylanase producing bacterial strains and produced enzymes in vitro for use as an environmentally harmless pulp bleaching agent in an industrial outlook. The theme of the project was to reduce pollution load on the environment caused by bleaching agents used in paper and pulp industry . The research project helped me hone my critical and analytical thinking and stimulated me to pursue advanced scientific knowledge. As a part of academics, I have also undergone one month training experience at Panacea Biotech. Ltd., a leading pharmaceutical company in India for two consecutive years. I learned to practice professional skills with a sense of time management, concurrence and teamwork. It is during this phase of my educational training that I was attracted towards the core pharmaceutical sciences. As describing myself, I would say that I hold

Slaughter house Five Critical Analysis free essay sample

Kurt Vonnegut uses Slaughterhouse-Five as a way to cope with his experience in the Dresden massacre. By taking the narrator’s voice, and by employing the themes of time and fate, Kurt Vonnegut seeks to reach out to the world, exposing to humanity the horrific aftermath of war. During World War II, Kurt Vonnegut was captured by the Germans and sent to the Dresden, â€Å"an open city with no significant targets,† to be held as a prisoner of war. On February 13, 1945, the Allied forces dropped incendiary bombs on the city, which created a â€Å"firestorm† that killed an estimated 135,000 people, and destroyed the city (Cox). When asked his purpose for writing, Vonnegut stated that he â€Å"agrees with Stalin and Hitler and Mussolini that the writer should serve his society,† however he disagreed with how they serve, saying, â€Å"they should be- and biologically have to be- agents of change† (Merril). In witnessing the massacre, Vonnegut felt as though it was his duty as a writer who had witnessed it first hand to write about this horrific massacre. We will write a custom essay sample on Slaughter house Five Critical Analysis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Remaining the single heaviest air strike in military history, Dresden is relatively ignored in histories eyes (Cox). Kurt Vonnegut takes an anti-war stance in order to enlighten the world of the unnecessary strike and to emphasize, as someone who witnessed it first hand, the horrors of war. The book uses the massacre as a foundation of the main conflicts in the novel, with every other event, simply as fleeting as a passage of time. In most novels, the author speaks through his characters, using the characters to represent the author’s overall message. However, by directly addressing the readers, Kurt Vonnegut conveys a much deeper personal significance behind his experience in Dresden. Twenty-three years after the massacre, Vonnegut finds himself â€Å"outlining the Dresden story many times† resulting, finally, in the writing of this book (Vonnegut 5). After so many years, this book represents his attempt to â€Å"come to terms with the horror of Dresden† (Vanderwerken). Yet, in the twenty-three years, he has not figured out what to say about it, as he expresses his struggles, â€Å"I have written five thousand pages by now, and thrown them all away† (Vonnegut 15). Ironically, Vonnegut compares the Dresden firebombing to a bird’s song, â€Å"Poo-tee-weet† (Vonnegut 19). He believes that â€Å"everything is supposed to be quiet after a massacre†¦except for the birds,† who say, â€Å"all there is to say about a massacre, things like â€Å"Poo-tee-weet† (Vonnegut 19). In this, Kurt Vonnegut emphasizes that nothing intelligent can be said about a massacre, only gibberish. Gibberish, in which even the birds cannot comprehend, let alone the men that fought in the war. Throughout his entire introduction, Kurt Vonnegut does not go into detail of the massacre, instead he emphasizes its aftermath. By focusing on the response (or lack of their of) and the affects of the massacre, he enhances overall power of his message. Vonnegut has played down the immediate impact of the war in order to make a â€Å"powerful little statement about the kinds of social attitudes responsible for war and its atrocities† (Merril). The solid, personal foundation of the book, which is the Dresden airstrike, builds a strong framework for the rest of the book and the moral statement it’s trying to show. Although this soon becomes covered up by the fantasy of the rest of the book, it is still very much there. Just as the individual impacts of war gets quickly covered up by the overall picture of war, they are still very much there, haunting the soldiers, even twenty-three years later. Kurt Vonnegut ends his introduction by introducing the beginning and end of the book: It begins like this: Listen: Billy Pilgrim has come unstuck in time. It ends like this: Poo-tee-weet? (Vonnegut 22) He tells us the beginning and the end, forgetting what is in the middle, jumping through time in order to introduce our main character, Billy Pilgrim. His writing shifts from the recollection of memories into short, fragmented flashbacks and flash-forwards. He explains this structure to his publisher, saying, â€Å"It’s so short and jumbled and jangles, Sam, because there is nothing intelligent to say about a massacre† (Cox). We are then emersed in the world of time travel as we become unstuck in time and travel with Billy throughout his memories Billy Pilgrim has become unstuck in time. Traveling back and forth throughout his life, Vonnegut introduces the theme of time in order to better explain the aftermath war. Reinforcing the concept of time itself, Billy is abducted by aliens known as the Tralfamadorians. Here, on the planet of Tralfamadore, time is not linear and does not take place in a sequential timeline of events. Instead, everything is simultaneous, occurring at the same time everywhere, â€Å"all moments, past, present, and future, always have existed, and always will exist† (Vonnegut 27). The Tralfamadorians are able to look at all moments like â€Å"looking at a stretch of the Rocky Mountains† (Vonnegut 27). They can choose to look at the entire landscape, or rather, the big picture, or they can focus in on one specific piece. This creates an important contrast with how humans view their lives, and how the Tralfamadorians view theirs. Humans are too focused on the minute details of the day-to-day things, instead, they need to step back and look at the big picture, or focus on the happy moments. The Tralfamadorians believe, in fact, that the way humans look at time is an â€Å"allusion† and that â€Å"like beads on a string, once a moment is gone, it is gone forever† (Vonnegut 27). On Tralfamadore, nothing is ever gone forever, which brings into consideration the concept and the importance of death. On Earth, humans believe that death is the most permanent thing, yet, on Tralfamadore, it is as insignificant as a blade of grass in the mountain landscape. There is no longer any sense of finality in their concept of death, and once they see a corpse, â€Å" all [they] think is that the dead person is in a bad condition in that particular moment, but that same person is just fine in plenty other moments† (Vonnegut 27). On Tralfamadore, they have managed to render death almost entirely unimportant, something that on Earth is considered almost impossible, that is, with the exception of war. In war, the individual solders no longer matter, deaths can occur by the thousands and a battle can still be considered â€Å"won. In Dresden, the mindless slaughtering of thousands of innocent people has somehow, in the eyes of war, been considered â€Å"necessary† for the greater good. Billy Pilgrim’s life literally began to flash before his eyes, as he was forced to relive his most traumatic memories. One of the first few times he became unstuck in time, Billy â€Å"began to swing grandly through the full arc of his life, pass ing into death, which was violet light. There wasn’t anybody else there, or anything. There was just violet light- and a hum† (Vonnegut 43). Experiencing the sudden, finality of death as calmly as any other step in life’s process is reserved for those of whom who were exposed to the horrors of massacres or wars. While stuck traveling through time Billy, â€Å"has no control of where he is going next†¦He is in a constant stage of fright, he says, because he never knows what part of his life he is going to have to act out next† (Vonnegut 23). Billy keeps being torn from his life, as he loses a sense of something that everything is innately given: reality. He has lost his sense of self and begins to feel the need to â€Å"act out† his life. Billy’s loss of identity and loss of control connects to the life of a soldier after war. After experiencing truly horrific situations over and over again, many solders begin to question who they are and the purpose of their life, leaving an empty hole of uncertainty where it used to be. If all of time was spontaneous with everything already mapped out, and death, therefore rendered insignificant, what then, is the purpose of action? If one could not change his destiny, would he have anything to fight for anymore? The last theme of free will questions action and inaction and its affects on life. As Billy begins to adjust to his life on Tralfamadore, he begins to question one of the greatest meanings of life, asking, â€Å"why me† (Vonnegut 76). The Tralfamadorians reply, â€Å"Why you? Why us for that matter? Why anything? Because this moment simply is. Have you ever seen bugs trapped in amber? Well here we are, Mr. Pilgrim, trapped in the amber of this moment. There is no why† (Vonnegut 77). In essence, we have no control of our destiny; we are left to watch as our lives play out before us, immobilized to change anything. According to Cox, â€Å"such a philosophy can, of ourse, lead to being passive and resigned rather than trying to oppose evil and make the world better. † For Billy, this realization resulted in living a life of inaction, for, â€Å"among the things Billy Pilgrim could not change were the past, the present, and the future† (Vonnegut 60). In fact, almost every character in Slaughterhouse-five has resolved themselves to inaction a nd slothfulness, even when their lives are on the line. Wandering across enemy lines, suddenly, Billy, Weary, and some others find themselves being shot at by German snipers. Seeing that the shot intended for him missed, â€Å"Billy stood there politely, giving the marksman another chance,† after all, â€Å"it was his addled understanding of the rules of warfare that the marksman should be given another chance (Vonnegut 33). Billy Pilgrim essentially looked death in the eye, and simply shrugged his shoulders in indifference. His entire time in war, Roland Weary had been trying to keep Billy alive, â€Å"he had been saving Billy’s life for days†¦it was absolutely necessary that cruelty be used, because Billy wouldn’t do anything to save himself† (Vonnegut 34). Instead of being fueled by the pursuit of freedom and the survival of their country, these soldiers seem beaten down, so much to the point of resolved hopelessness and acceptance of death as a consequence of their inaction. The idea of war, fighting for a common cause, for the survival of the country, and for the future generations has been crushed in this book. Nothing about war is beneficial, and it is reflected in Vonnegut’s characters. When asked about their moral inaction, Vonnegut responded, saying, â€Å"There are almost no characters in this story, and almost no dramatic confrontations, because most of the people in it are so sick and so much the listless playthings of enormous forces† (Cox). The author’s commentary once again confirms the deflating, and dehumanizing aspect of war. There are no characters in this story, simply because there are no true humans in war. No man can retain his self-identity after witnessing and experiencing the horrific aspects associated with war a massacre. Kurt Vonnegut employs the theme of free will to emphasize the lack of humanity regarding war. In this, we see a personal struggle of his surface. Like every other person who has been in war, Kurt Vonnegut came back a different man, a man who no longer recognized himself. Yet, he finds a certain resolved acceptance that this pain, the pain of war and the pain of suffering, is engrained into our nature. In his introduction, he met with a man named Harrison Star who asked him if his book is â€Å"an anti-war book,† when Vonnegut confirmed, he replied, â€Å"you know what I say to people when I hear they’re writing an anti-war book? I say why don’t you write an anti-glacier book instead,† Vonnegut replied, â€Å"I believe that, too† (Vonnegut 3). There will always be suffering, murder, massacres and wars; its part of our human nature. To revert back to a world where there is no longer suffering, one must trace their roots all the way back to â€Å"two perfect people named Adam and Eve† (Vonnegut 74). As a somewhat comforting sentiment, Vonnegut begins to cope with his war experiences simply by understanding that many people have been in his place before him, and there will be many after him. After witnessing so much tragedy in war, Kurt Vonnegut wrote Slaughterhouse-Five as a way to cope with what he lived through during the war and as a way to reach out to humanity and induce understanding of the after affects of war. Witnessing firsthand the mindless slaughter of thousands of innocent lives in the Dresden massacre, Vonnegut felt as though it was his duty as a writer to write about it, and hopefully, bring awareness to the horrors of war. Published during the height of the Vietnam War, Slaughterhouse-Five did just that. Cox) At this time, anti-war protests were beginning to circle the country and, as a result, â€Å"struck such a chord with the reading public and [it] made its author a cultural icon† (Cox). Slaughterhouse-Five no doubt played a role in the public realization of the â€Å"horrors of war (and American responsibility for some of those horrors)† Slaughterhouse-Five’s enormous impact and powerful moral statement will continue to stand the test of time, remaining a â€Å"masterly novel†¦of compassion,† as fate would have it (Cox). Slaughter house Five Critical Analysis free essay sample TitanCoping with Porn Stars and Plungers Inside a fantasy world of time travel, aliens, and porn stars, Kurt Vonnegut delivers an iron hard moral statement on the aftermath of war in his novel, Slaughterhouse-Five. We follow the fictional character, Billy Pilgrim, as he struggles, like Vonnegut did, to discover the purpose of life. Kurt Vonnegut uses Slaughterhouse-Five as a way to cope with his experience in the Dresden massacre. By taking the narrator’s voice, and by employing the themes of time and fate, Kurt Vonnegut seeks to reach out to the world, exposing to humanity the horrific aftermath of war. During World War II, Kurt Vonnegut was captured by the Germans and sent to the Dresden, â€Å"an open city with no significant targets,† to be held as a prisoner of war. On February 13, 1945, the Allied forces dropped incendiary bombs on the city, which created a â€Å"firestorm† that killed an estimated 135,000 people, and destroyed the city (Cox). We will write a custom essay sample on Slaughter house Five Critical Analysis or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When asked his purpose for writing, Vonnegut stated that he â€Å"agrees with Stalin and Hitler and Mussolini that the writer should serve his society,† however he disagreed with how they serve, saying, â€Å"they should be- and biologically have to be- agents of change† (Merril). In witnessing the massacre, Vonnegut felt as though it was his duty as a writer who had witnessed it first hand to write about this horrific massacre. Remaining the single heaviest air strike in military history, Dresden is relatively ignored in histories eyes (Cox). Kurt Vonnegut takes an anti-war stance in order to enlighten the world of the unnecessary strike and to emphasize, as someone who witnessed it first hand, the horrors of war. The book uses the massacre as a foundation of the main conflicts in the novel, with every other event, simply as fleeting as a passage of time. In most novels, the author speaks through his characters, using the characters to represent the author’s overall message. However, by directly addressing the readers, Kurt Vonnegut conveys a much deeper personal significance behind his experience in Dresden. Twenty-three years after the massacre, Vonnegut finds himself â€Å"outlining the Dresden story many times† resulting, finally, in the writing of this book (Vonnegut 5). After so many years, this book represents his attempt to â€Å"come to terms with the horror of Dresden† (Vanderwerken). Yet, in the twenty-three years, he has not figured out what to say about it, as he expresses his struggles, â€Å"I have written five thousand pages by now, and thrown them all away† (Vonnegut 15). Ironically, Vonnegut compares the Dresden firebombing to a bird’s song, â€Å"Poo-tee-weet† (Vonnegut 19). He believes that â€Å"everything is supposed to be quiet after a massacre†¦except for the birds,† who say, â€Å"all there is to say about a massacre, things like â€Å"Poo-tee-weet† (Vonnegut 19). In this, Kurt Vonnegut emphasizes that nothing intelligent can be said about a massacre, only gibberish. Gibberish, in which even the birds cannot comprehend, let alone the men that fought in the war. Throughout his entire introduction, Kurt Vonnegut does not go into detail of the massacre, instead he emphasizes its aftermath. By focusing on the response (or lack of their of) and the affects of the massacre, he enhances overall power of his message. Vonnegut has played down the immediate impact of the war in order to make a â€Å"powerful little statement about the kinds of social attitudes responsible for war and its atrocities† (Merril). The solid, personal foundation of the book, which is the Dresden airstrike, builds a strong framework for the rest of the book and the moral statement it’s trying to show. Although this soon becomes covered up by the fantasy of the rest of the book, it is still very much there. Just as the individual impacts of war gets quickly covered up by the overall picture of war, they are still very much there, haunting the soldiers, even twenty-three years later. Kurt Vonnegut ends his introduction by introducing the beginning and end of the book: It begins like this: Listen: Billy Pilgrim has come unstuck in time. It ends like this: Poo-tee-weet? (Vonnegut 22) He tells us the beginning and the end, forgetting what is in the middle, jumping through time in order to introduce our main character, Billy Pilgrim. His writing shifts from the recollection of memories into short, fragmented flashbacks and flash-forwards. He explains this structure to his publisher, saying, â€Å"It’s so short and jumbled and jangles, Sam, because there is nothing intelligent to say about a massacre† (Cox). We are then emersed in the world of time travel as we become unstuck in time and travel with Billy throughout his memories Billy Pilgrim has become unstuck in time. Traveling back and forth throughout his life, Vonnegut introduces the theme of time in order to better explain the aftermath war. Reinforcing the concept of time itself, Billy is abducted by aliens known as the Tralfamadorians. Here, on the planet of Tralfamadore, time is not linear and does not take place in a sequential timeline of events. Instead, everything is simultaneous, occurring at the same time everywhere, â€Å"all moments, past, present, and future, always have existed, and always will exist† (Vonnegut 27). The Tralfamadorians are able to look at all moments like â€Å"looking at a stretch of the Rocky Mountains† (Vonnegut 27). They can choose to look at the entire landscape, or rather, the big picture, or they can focus in on one specific piece. This creates an important contrast with how humans view their lives, and how the Tralfamadorians view theirs. Humans are too focused on the minute details of the day-to-day things, instead, they need to step back and look at the big picture, or focus on the happy moments. The Tralfamadorians believe, in fact, that the way humans look at time is an â€Å"allusion† and that â€Å"like beads on a string, once a moment is gone, it is gone forever† (Vonnegut 27). On Tralfamadore, nothing is ever gone forever, which brings into consideration the concept and the importance of death. On Earth, humans believe that death is the most permanent thing, yet, on Tralfamadore, it is as insignificant as a blade of grass in the mountain landscape. There is no longer any sense of finality in their concept of death, and once they see a corpse, â€Å" all [they] think is that the dead person is in a bad condition in that particular moment, but that same person is just fine in plenty other moments† (Vonnegut 27). On Tralfamadore, they have managed to render death almost entirely unimportant, something that on Earth is considered almost impossible, that is, with the exception of war. In war, the individual solders no longer matter, deaths can occur by the thousands and a battle can still be considered â€Å"won. In Dresden, the mindless slaughtering of thousands of innocent people has somehow, in the eyes of war, been considered â€Å"necessary† for the greater good. Billy Pilgrim’s life literally began to flash before his eyes, as he was forced to relive his most traumatic memories. One of the first few times he became unstuck in time, Billy â€Å"began to swing grandly through the full arc of his life, pass ing into death, which was violet light. There wasn’t anybody else there, or anything. There was just violet light- and a hum† (Vonnegut 43). Experiencing the sudden, finality of death as calmly as any other step in life’s process is reserved for those of whom who were exposed to the horrors of massacres or wars. While stuck traveling through time Billy, â€Å"has no control of where he is going next†¦He is in a constant stage of fright, he says, because he never knows what part of his life he is going to have to act out next† (Vonnegut 23). Billy keeps being torn from his life, as he loses a sense of something that everything is innately given: reality. He has lost his sense of self and begins to feel the need to â€Å"act out† his life. Billy’s loss of identity and loss of control connects to the life of a soldier after war. After experiencing truly horrific situations over and over again, many solders begin to question who they are and the purpose of their life, leaving an empty hole of uncertainty where it used to be. If all of time was spontaneous with everything already mapped out, and death, therefore rendered insignificant, what then, is the purpose of action? If one could not change his destiny, would he have anything to fight for anymore? The last theme of free will questions action and inaction and its affects on life. As Billy begins to adjust to his life on Tralfamadore, he begins to question one of the greatest meanings of life, asking, â€Å"why me† (Vonnegut 76). The Tralfamadorians reply, â€Å"Why you? Why us for that matter? Why anything? Because this moment simply is. Have you ever seen bugs trapped in amber? Well here we are, Mr. Pilgrim, trapped in the amber of this moment. There is no why† (Vonnegut 77). In essence, we have no control of our destiny; we are left to watch as our lives play out before us, immobilized to change anything. According to Cox, â€Å"such a philosophy can, of ourse, lead to being passive and resigned rather than trying to oppose evil and make the world better. † For Billy, this realization resulted in living a life of inaction, for, â€Å"among the things Billy Pilgrim could not change were the past, the present, and the future† (Vonnegut 60). In fact, almost every character in Slaughterhouse-five has resolved themselves to inaction a nd slothfulness, even when their lives are on the line. Wandering across enemy lines, suddenly, Billy, Weary, and some others find themselves being shot at by German snipers. Seeing that the shot intended for him missed, â€Å"Billy stood there politely, giving the marksman another chance,† after all, â€Å"it was his addled understanding of the rules of warfare that the marksman should be given another chance (Vonnegut 33). Billy Pilgrim essentially looked death in the eye, and simply shrugged his shoulders in indifference. His entire time in war, Roland Weary had been trying to keep Billy alive, â€Å"he had been saving Billy’s life for days†¦it was absolutely necessary that cruelty be used, because Billy wouldn’t do anything to save himself† (Vonnegut 34). Instead of being fueled by the pursuit of freedom and the survival of their country, these soldiers seem beaten down, so much to the point of resolved hopelessness and acceptance of death as a consequence of their inaction. The idea of war, fighting for a common cause, for the survival of the country, and for the future generations has been crushed in this book. Nothing about war is beneficial, and it is reflected in Vonnegut’s characters. When asked about their moral inaction, Vonnegut responded, saying, â€Å"There are almost no characters in this story, and almost no dramatic confrontations, because most of the people in it are so sick and so much the listless playthings of enormous forces† (Cox). The author’s commentary once again confirms the deflating, and dehumanizing aspect of war. There are no characters in this story, simply because there are no true humans in war. No man can retain his self-identity after witnessing and experiencing the horrific aspects associated with war a massacre. Kurt Vonnegut employs the theme of free will to emphasize the lack of humanity regarding war. In this, we see a personal struggle of his surface. Like every other person who has been in war, Kurt Vonnegut came back a different man, a man who no longer recognized himself. Yet, he finds a certain resolved acceptance that this pain, the pain of war and the pain of suffering, is engrained into our nature. In his introduction, he met with a man named Harrison Star who asked him if his book is â€Å"an anti-war book,† when Vonnegut confirmed, he replied, â€Å"you know what I say to people when I hear they’re writing an anti-war book? I say why don’t you write an anti-glacier book instead,† Vonnegut replied, â€Å"I believe that, too† (Vonnegut 3). There will always be suffering, murder, massacres and wars; its part of our human nature. To revert back to a world where there is no longer suffering, one must trace their roots all the way back to â€Å"two perfect people named Adam and Eve† (Vonnegut 74). As a somewhat comforting sentiment, Vonnegut begins to cope with his war experiences simply by understanding that many people have been in his place before him, and there will be many after him. After witnessing so much tragedy in war, Kurt Vonnegut wrote Slaughterhouse-Five as a way to cope with what he lived through during the war and as a way to reach out to humanity and induce understanding of the after affects of war. Witnessing firsthand the mindless slaughter of thousands of innocent lives in the Dresden massacre, Vonnegut felt as though it was his duty as a writer to write about it, and hopefully, bring awareness to the horrors of war. Published during the height of the Vietnam War, Slaughterhouse-Five did just that. Cox) At this time, anti-war protests were beginning to circle the country and, as a result, â€Å"struck such a chord with the reading public and [it] made its author a cultural icon† (Cox). Slaughterhouse-Five no doubt played a role in the public realization of the â€Å"horrors of war (and American responsibility for some of those horrors)† Slaughterhouse-Five’s enormous impact and powerful moral statement will continue to stand th e test of time, remaining a â€Å"masterly novel†¦of compassion,† as fate would have it (Cox).